Harry Knowlman
Barrister

Harry has over 35 years’ experience in engineering, property development, and construction, with a particular focus on the residential sector.

After completing a law degree in 2015 he commenced practice as a barrister, specialising in general commercial, construction, and planning law.

Harry Knowlman Barrister

Qualifications/ Memberships

Bachelor of Engineering (Hons) 1981 – University of Queensland
Bachelor of Laws (Hons) 2015 – University of Queensland
Registered Professional Engineer Qld #03375
Member, Institution of Engineers Australia
Member, Bar Association of Queensland
Licensed Builder #24383 (open class)
Barrister at Law

Experience

2017 – Present – Barrister
2002 – 2017 – Nyoongai Pty Ltd – property development, residential and rural investment
1990 – 2002 – Knowlman & Swindon – design & construct housebuilding
1988 – 1990 – Griffin & Knowlman Pty Ltd – construction, residential development
1986 – 1988 – Structural Engineer , Ove Arup & Partners, London
1982 – 1985 – Graduate Engineer , McWilliams, Brisbane.

about harry knowlman

Harry Knowlman has long experience in business, engineering, construction, and property. Throughout his career he has dealt with legal matters involving contracts, planning, and taxation, as well as business and financial management, employee relationships, and negotiation.

He has been self-employed, and carried out or overseen all functions of management and operations in his businesses, for over 25 years. He owned and operated a house design and construct business for 12 years, then after retiring from construction owned and ran a successful property development business, specializing in residential land subdivision and multi-residential projects.

He has been involved with property investment, development, and town planning issues throughout his career, including development application preparation (code and impact assessable, “risksmart”, over-density, and “generally inappropriate”) and submissions on both city and neighbourhood plan changes. He has experience with submitter appeals against approvals, and developer appeals against refusals, including in the Planning & Environment Court. He has experience negotiating with local authorities and with both friendly and hostile interested parties and neighbours.

Since being called to the bar Harry has been involved in a wide range of matters including contract, consumer, planning, employment, construction, and professional liability disputes, and appeared in the Court of Appeal, the Supreme Court, the District Court, the Planning and Environment Court, and QCAT.

He naturally has a particular interest in building and construction, planning, property, and commercial law, and also accepts briefs in insurance, consumer and trade practices, and succession.

DOWNLOAD CV

Areas of Practice

+ Building & Construction
+ Commercial Law
+ Planning & Property
+ Insurance
+ Consumer & Trade
+ Succession

Recent Cases and Articles

Recent Posts / View All Posts

Planning for approval – Code and impact assessment under the Planning Act 2016

| Articles | No Comments
The Planning Act 2016 (Qld) (PA) commenced on 3 July 2017, replacing the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (SPA) as the primary legislation regulating development in Queensland. The provisions under which development applications are to be determined (approved or refused) are substantially changed in the PA. How the court interprets and…

Peach v Brisbane City Council & Anor [2019] QPEC 41

| Cases | No Comments
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT – APPEAL – where submitter appeal against approval – where approval for a mixed use high-rise development – where development does not comply with planning scheme in force at the time the development application was properly made – where latter amendments made to planning scheme – whether…

Schoch v Queensland Building and Construction Commission [2019] QCAT 172

| Cases | No Comments
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS – QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL – where applicant seeks final decisions before a full hearing – whether respondent caused unnecessary disadvantage – whether discretion should be exercised. Full judgment on the Supreme Court Library website.